State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that determining whether a word has been used in a technical sense depends on \the manner or context in which the words are used\
• \nonconsumable\ found not to have technical legal meaning; statute therefore interpreted based on common meaning of the term
• statute using term \nonconsumable\ not unconstitutionally vague, because term's reasonable meaning was applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• City of Tampa v. Thatcher Glass Corp.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-02-09· cited 41×
• Loxahatchee Ecd v. Sch. Bd. Palm Beach Cty.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-10-29· cited 27×
• Crews v. Florida Public Employers Council 79
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-05· cited 7×
• Willens v. Garcia
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-26· cited 7×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. CHESTER RALPH KWITOWSKI, JR.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-06-20· cited 2×
• Taylor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-12-06

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Newman v. Carson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-11· cited 53×