Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 9225
  • 103 N.E.3d 305

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling Defendant-appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The trial court's judgment is not subject to reversal upon the basis that Defendant-appellant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to appeal to the extent allowed by law, or that, more generally, Defendant-appellant's pleas were less than knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. The trial court's restitution order is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. The trial court, finally, did not err by ordering Defendant-appellant to pay court costs. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.