State v. Brown
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 9225
- 103 N.E.3d 305
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling Defendant-appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. The trial court's judgment is not subject to reversal upon the basis that Defendant-appellant did not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waive his right to appeal to the extent allowed by law, or that, more generally, Defendant-appellant's pleas were less than knowing, voluntary, and intelligent. The trial court's restitution order is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. The trial court, finally, did not err by ordering Defendant-appellant to pay court costs. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DonaldsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-01-27· cited 6×
- State v. Presutto-SaghafiOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-30· cited 5×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-26· cited 3×
- State v. DunnOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-16· cited 3×
- State v. DumasOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-04· cited 1×
- State v. HarnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-03
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. DarmondOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 392×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2004-11-24· cited 299×
- State v. BecraftOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-04-21· cited 30×
- State v. GuerraOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-02· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.