Missouri Court of Appeals· 12/18/1984
State v. Brown
Citations
- 683 S.W.2d 301
- 1984 Mo. App. LEXIS 4863
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- can infer defendant was aware of the presence of pills openly visible in the car, but cannot infer he was aware of the nature of the pills he believed were his sister’s diet pills
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Reinhard, Dowd, Crist, Crandall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-03-26· cited 21×
- State v. NorwoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-11-12· cited 14×
- State v. CamdenMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-07-07· cited 13×
- State v. LubbersMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-04-30· cited 12×
- State v. VincentMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-06-21· cited 12×
- State v. CaldwellMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-08-20· cited 11×
- State v. RayMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-03-29· cited 11×
- State v. SandMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-05-15· cited 9×
- State v. WatsonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2009-06-19· cited 5×
- State v. WenzelMissouri Court of Appeals· 2003-11-19· cited 5×
- State v. BurnettMissouri Court of Appeals· 1997-09-30· cited 2×
- State v. DuckworthMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-04-24
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.