District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/12/2010
State v. Brown
Citations
- 36 So. 3d 770
- 2010 WL 1875571
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[R]eversal is [independently] required . . . because of the holding of Hudson that even established violations of the [knock-and-announce] principle do not implicate the exclusionary rule so as to suppress pertinent evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wells and Shepherd, Jj., and Schwartz, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CableSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-12-09· cited 16×
- State of Florida v. Christopher MarkusSupreme Court of Florida· 2017-01-31· cited 12×
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-07-11· cited 1×
- Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-30· cited 1×
- State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17
- State of Florida v. Keith Alexander TimesSupreme Court of Florida· 2026-06-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.