State v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Each of the statutory provisions defining possession and manufacture of a controlled substance requires proof of an element that the other does not....\
• “Each of the statutory provisions defining possession and manufacture of a controlled substance requires proof of an element that the other does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gonzalo Dominguez v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-07-21· cited 60×
• People of Michigan v. Richard Allen Baham
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2017-09-12· cited 40×
• State v. Luers
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-02-14· cited 35×
• State v. Sargent
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-12-11· cited 33×
• State v. Guzman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-04-17· cited 13×
• State v. Heneghan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-09-04· cited 11×
• Gonzalo Dominguez v. William Barr
  Ninth Circuit· 2020-09-18
• State v. Modrell-Lydall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-06-08

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hansen
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-29· cited 156×
• State v. Crotsley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-08-29· cited 107×
• State v. Alvarez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-06-27· cited 38×
• State v. Atkinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-08-09· cited 23×
• State v. Owens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-07-18· cited 17×
• State v. Hermach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-08-03· cited 11×