Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/20/1988

State v. Brown

Citations

748 P.2d 276
50 Wash. App. 405
1988 Wash. App. LEXIS 19

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that bomb threat statute is not overbroad because it can be narrowly interpreted to prohibit only nonprotected threats
“when the challenge asserts that the statute under which the defendant is charged is in its entirety unconstitutionally vague on its face, the challenger has standing”
threat to cause bodily injury or physical damage to the property of another is not protected speech
threat to cause bodily injury or physical damage to the property of another is not protected speech
threat to cause bodily injury or physical damage to the property of another is not protected speech
RCW 9.61.160 is “not overbroad because it is readily susceptible to a narrow construction . . . which limits its application to unprotected speech,” i.e., threats of harm to others

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.