Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 447 P.2d 82
  • 74 Wash. 2d 799
  • 1968 Wash. LEXIS 822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that failure to request a continuance after an information is amended at the start of trial is \persuasive of a lack of surprise and prejudice\
  • holding that failure to request a continuance after an information is amended at the start of trial is \persuasive of a lack of surprise and prejudice\
  • holding no prejudice shown where amended information charged a lower degree of assault than did the original information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.