Ohio Supreme Court· 9/8/1992

State v. Brown

Citations

1992 Ohio 19

Syllabus

Criminal law - Evidence - Witnesses - Criminal defendant has constitutional right to compulsory process over a potential witness he believes acted as an informant in his case and whose testimony would be relevant and aid in his defense.

Judges: Wright, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Fairman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-16· cited 26×
State v. White
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-01· cited 6×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Taylor v. Illinois
Supreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 1,952×
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 118×
State v. Phillips
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-07-21· cited 83×
United States v. Miriam Rodriguez Diaz
Fifth Circuit· 1981-09-08· cited 69×
United States v. Donnie Eugene Halbert
Tenth Circuit· 1982-01-14· cited 54×
State v. Butler
Ohio Supreme Court· 1984-02-15· cited 17×
State v. Roe
Ohio Supreme Court· 1971-06-23· cited 16×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.