State v. Brown
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5546
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion to suppress two firearms found in appellant's vehicle as the warrantless search of the vehicle was authorized by the automobile exception to the warrant requirement. The trial court erred in ordering the forfeiture of firearms and ammunition recovered from appellant's vehicle where the state did not provide notice of its intent to seek forfeiture in either the charging instrument or in a bill of particulars.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 3,763×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- State v. BoboOhio Supreme Court· 1988-06-15· cited 1,010×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. DurhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-28· cited 68×
- State v. VundaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-11· cited 37×
- State v. HarshOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-27· cited 16×
- State v. LittleOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-27· cited 8×
- State v. DunnOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-21· cited 5×
- State v. HumphreyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-18· cited 4×
- State v. MaffeyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-19· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.