State v. Brooks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one entry can support only one conviction for burglary and distinguishing precedent holding that robbery of multiple victims supports multiple convictions
• recognizing that it was improper to analogize burglary to robbery, making the number of victims the focus of the analysis, because the focus should be on the number of entries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Swick
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 271×
• State Of Washington v. David Novick
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-10-25· cited 6×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rupe
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-06-07· cited 299×
• State v. Adel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 263×
• State v. Tili
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 252×
• In Re Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Davis
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-11-02· cited 98×
• State v. Marintorres
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-01-08· cited 77×
• State v. Bright
  Washington Supreme Court· 1996-05-16· cited 65×
• Sarausad v. State
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-20· cited 56×
• In re the Personal Restraint of Sarausad
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-11-26· cited 53×
• State v. Berrysmith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-11· cited 22×
• State v. Davison
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1990-01-08· cited 19×
• State v. Larkin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1993-05-03· cited 17×