Skip to main content

State v. Brock

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 759

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in overruling Defendant's motion to suppress statements he made to the police under circumstances presented, Defendant was not in custody at the time his statements were made. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant's request for new counsel the day before his scheduled trial, where his concerns about counsel's representation did not demonstrate that counsel was not providing effective assistance. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Froelich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.