State v. Brock
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 759
Syllabus
Trial court did not err in overruling Defendant's motion to suppress statements he made to the police under circumstances presented, Defendant was not in custody at the time his statements were made. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Defendant's request for new counsel the day before his scheduled trial, where his concerns about counsel's representation did not demonstrate that counsel was not providing effective assistance. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- State v. KelleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 437×
- State v. BirosOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 432×
- State v. HattenOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-02-12· cited 50×
- State v. CrawfordOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-01-27· cited 7×
- State v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-23· cited 6×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-04-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.