State v. Britten
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5580
Syllabus
COMPULSORY PROCESSES — CRIM.R. 11(C) — CRIM.R. 32.1 — PRESENTENCE MOTION TO WITHDRAW GUILTY PLEA: The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C) and properly informed defendant that he was waiving his right to compulsory process by entering guilty pleas where the court told defendant his attorney could obtain witnesses to testify on his behalf, the executed plea-waiver form indicated that defendant was waiving his right to subpoena witnesses, and defendant acknowledged during the plea colloquy that he had reviewed the plea-waiver form with counsel and understood it. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas where the defendant was not pressured or threatened to enter his pleas.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. XieOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-12· cited 1,682×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. SimsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-01· cited 38×
- State v. ConleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-19· cited 10×
- State v. GreenOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-17· cited 5×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-01· cited 3×
- State v. ZacharyOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-07· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.