Skip to main content

State v. Brime

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1003

Syllabus

GUILTY PLEA—CRIM.R. 32.1—POSTCONVICTION MOTION: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his guilty plea without a hearing. Defendant failed to show that a hearing was warranted or that withdrawal of his pleas was necessary to correct a manifest injustice where defendant failed to sustain his burden of demonstrating his actual innocence of the charged offense, legal impossibility, or any error on the part of trial counsel. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.