Louisiana Court of Appeal· 6/12/1996
State v. Bright
Citations
- 676 So. 2d 189
- 1996 WL 325931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court abused its discretion when it terminated voir dire before defense counsel had an opportunity to question all jurors individually
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciaccio, Armstrong and Waltzer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-07-11· cited 101×
- American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 40×
- In the Matter of a Grand Jury InvestigationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-01-12· cited 6×
- DEMETRIUS JEFFREY HOPKINS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-12· cited 5×
- State ex rel. M.J.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2017-05-02· cited 3×
- State v. MenardLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2003-05-07· cited 2×
- State v. DiazLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1998-02-25
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1986-09-08· cited 61×
- State v. TannerSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1984-10-15· cited 36×
- United States v. Leonard R. Shewfelt and Imperial County Land CompanyNinth Circuit· 1972-05-22· cited 35×
- United States v. T. Windle DyerFifth Circuit· 1983-12-27· cited 27×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-12-23· cited 18×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1987-02-23· cited 11×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1995-06-30· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.