Skip to main content
· 12/27/1983

United States v. T. Windle Dyer

Citations

  • 722 F.2d 174
  • 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 14155
  • 14 Fed. R. Serv. 1368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a defendant’s use of a civil attorney to obtain a false exculpatory letter was not privileged under the crime-fraud exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Garza, Williams, Hig-Ginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.