State v. Briggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the distinction between principals and accessories before the fact “abolished” by statute and a defendant will be considered a principal regardless of whether he or she was charged as a principal or accessory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Orecchio
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1954-06-28· cited 180×
• Reed v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2010-12-29· cited 58×
• Governing Board v. Pannill
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-16· cited 30×
• State v. Dolliver
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1921-10-21· cited 20×
• State v. Whitman
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1908-01-10· cited 16×
• State v. Isaacson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1923-05-18· cited 4×
• State v. Brooks
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1922-04-07· cited 3×
• Browder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-06-12· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Henn
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1888-11-28· cited 14×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1882-05-27· cited 9×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1901-01-30· cited 6×