Court of Appeals of Washington· 2/12/1999
State v. Briggs
Citations
- 971 P.2d 581
- 94 Wash. App. 299
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the trial court did not lack inherent power to make a decision where it had both personal and subject matter jurisdiction and that the relevant orders were not void, even if they were voidable
- noting court can vacate void or voidable judgments under CR 60
- when stipulation regarding paternity was purportedly entered without client’s consent, resulting judgment was merely voidable not void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridgewater
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-03-25· cited 54×
- In Re Estates of SmaldinoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-07-27· cited 22×
- Todd v. MoenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-07-27· cited 20×
- In re the Marriage of Mu ChaiCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-07-06· cited 19×
- Housing Authority v. NewbiggingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-08· cited 16×
- Ellison v. Process Systems Inc. Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-06-20· cited 14×
- Summers v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE FOR STATECourt of Appeals of Washington· 2003-07-05· cited 11×
- Summers v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-02· cited 11×
- Chai v. KongCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-08-30· cited 8×
- Cook v. Von SteinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-10-22· cited 7×
- Nguyen v. Sacred Heart Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-04· cited 6×
- Matia Investment Fund, Inc. v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-13· cited 5×
- Ellison v. Process Systems Inc. Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-07-30· cited 4×
- Matia Inv. Fund, Inc. v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-13· cited 1×
- DeYoung v. Cenex Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-05-25· cited 1×
- Heidi Kaufman v. Geoffrey KaufmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2021-04-27
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dike v. DikeWashington Supreme Court· 1968-12-05· cited 136×
- Haller v. WallisWashington Supreme Court· 1978-01-19· cited 125×
- Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1943-04-26· cited 121×
- In Re Marriage of LeslieWashington Supreme Court· 1989-05-18· cited 72×
- Cook v. VennigerholzWashington Supreme Court· 1954-04-22· cited 33×
- Baird v. BairdCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-03-20· cited 31×
- Mid-City Materials, Inc. v. Heater Beaters Custom FireplacesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-01-16· cited 28×
- Riordan v. Commercial Travelers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-07-17· cited 22×
- Long v. HarroldCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-12-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.