State v. Brant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “According to this provision [§ 40-17-130], a security guard licensed by SLED stands in the shoes of the sheriff for purposes of arrest while he is on the property is is hired to protect.” (emphasis added)
• arrest by security guard on licensed premises is action under color of state within scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chiles v. Crooks
  D. South Carolina· 1989-02-01· cited 6×
• City of Easley v. Cartee
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-11-30· cited 3×
• In the Interest of Joseph B.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-04

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Crenshaw
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-09· cited 40×
• Southern Railway Co. v. South Carolina State Highway Department
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1960-08-03· cited 11×
• State v. Sweat
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-06-16· cited 8×