Skip to main content

State v. Branch

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 132

Syllabus

Maximum sentence, findings of fact, R.C. 2929.141, abuse of discretion, psychological evaluation. A trial court is not required to place findings of fact and conclusions of law on the record when imposing a maximum sentence where the trial court on the record and in its journal entry notes that it considered the required factors. The mere fact that the trial court emphasized certain facts and did not mention others, does not mean the trial court failed to consider relevant factors. Appellate court may only review the record before it. Where the record is silent as to an issue argued by appellant, the court is unable to review it. Finally, a trial court does not abuse its discretion when it fails to order a second psychological evaluation when the first psychological evaluation suggests appellant is malingering and appellant's multiple pro se filings and colloquy with the court display appellant's understanding of the proceedings and his ability to assist his attorney.

Judges: Groves

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.