Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/8/1943
State v. Brady
Citations
- 156 Kan. 831
- 137 P.2d 206
- 1943 Kan. LEXIS 99
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]t is well settled that courts have inherent powers ... to effectuate the functions and duties imposed upon them.”
- \[I]t is well settled that courts have inherent powers . . . to effectuate the functions and duties imposed upon them.\
- court’s role in implementing death penalty and clemency issues
- court's role in implementing death penalty and clemency issues
- court’s role in implementing death penalty and clemency issues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Misión Industrial de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Junta de Calidad AmbientalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1998-06-29· cited 88×
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2016-02-11· cited 75×
- State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. UNIFIED GOV. OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY/KANSAS CITYSupreme Court of Kansas· 1998-03-06· cited 73×
- Wilson v. American Fidelity InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas· 1981-03-25· cited 33×
- Andrews v. HandSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-06-09· cited 25×
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-11-06· cited 25×
- Excel Corp. v. JimenezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-06-02· cited 11×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1950-04-08· cited 8×
- White v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-11-13· cited 3×
- State v. CrowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-05-07· cited 3×
- Wilson v. HudspethSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-11-30· cited 2×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2002-03-26
- In re HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2017-04-07
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wilkerson v. UtahSupreme Court· 1879-03-17· cited 344×
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1909-04-12· cited 44×
- State v. AlmySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1892-06-05· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. McDermottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-04-12· cited 24×
- Munkley v. HoytMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1901-05-23· cited 12×
- Marx v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1903-10-26· cited 10×
- State v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1898-05-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.