State v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• due process violation to deny defendant’s motion to summon out-of-state material witness to testify under Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings under A.R.S. §§ 13-4091 through 13-4096
• due process violation to deny defendant's motion to summon out-of-state material witness to testify under Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings under A.R.S. §§ 13-4091 through 13-4096
• California's reciprocal law permits summoning declarant incarcerated in California
• California's reciprocal law permits summoning declarant incarcerated in California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Harrod
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2001-07-16· cited 53×
• Tracy v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 42×
• State v. Carlos
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-01-25· cited 34×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-11-24· cited 16×
• State v. Talmadge
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2000-05-05· cited 7×
• In re the Proceedings to Compel the Attendance of Fitiausi
  High Court of American Samoa· 1995-11-06