State v. Brady

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s fingerprints on filing cabinet that had been moved and rifled by thief; homeowner never allowed defendant inside house; homeowner bought the cabinet new and had recently cleaned it
• “It is well established in our state that a crime may be proven by circumstantial evidence alone, and that fingerprints are a means of positive 7 STATE v. HILL Decision of the Court identification by which a defendant may be linked with the commission of the offense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-07-14· cited 123×
• State v. Jerousek
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1979-02-06· cited 76×
• State v. Burton
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 47×
• Meadows v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-09-19· cited 38×
• State v. Dixon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-10-05· cited 37×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-10-31· cited 15×
• State v. Miller
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1968-04-01· cited 15×
• Roland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-02-26· cited 12×
• State v. Carter
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 10×
• State v. Bridges
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-04-30· cited 7×
• State v. Sexton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-08-08· cited 6×
• State v. Spain
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-10-28· cited 6×
• State v. Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-06-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Moon v. State
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1921-06-07· cited 51×
• Witt Ice & Gas Co. v. Bedway
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1951-05-28· cited 27×
• State v. Price
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1954-01-11· cited 6×
• Brough v. State of Arizona
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1939-10-23· cited 3×