State v. Bradford

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 8481

Syllabus

Crim.R. 29/motion for acquittal sufficiency, manifest weight, R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(b) and (g)/sentencing. Evidence showed that appellant had more than a mere association with gang members, and evidence was presented sufficient enough to infer that appellant was the driver involved in the shooting. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for acquittal. Witness testimony in question by appellant was corroborated by other witness testimony, and the trial court further found their testimony credible. Witness testimony and other evidence did not weigh against conviction. Two of appellant's offenses are not enumerated in R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(g) and the trial court, therefore, was not mandated to run the firearm specifications for those offenses consecutive to the other firearm specifications.