Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/8/2021
State v. Bozarth
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 14
Syllabus
Appellant's 30-month sentence for aggravated possession of drugs was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record the record does not support appellant's claim that that his due process rights were violated because the court relied on inaccurate information. No ineffective assistance of counsel shown. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. MathisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court· 1992-12-18· cited 551×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. LeopardOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
- State v. FieldsOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-03· cited 60×
- State v. HuffmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.