State v. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing RCW 9A.44.115(2) and noting its “‘purpose is to promote safety and welfare’”
• appellant convicted of peering up and taking pictures up the victims’ skirts, but the pictures were used as evidence of his voyeurism and not separately prosecuted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Quick
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2014-10-31· cited 16×
• State Of Washington, V. Alfonso Aguilar
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-08-21· cited 4×
• Robinson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10
• State Of Washington, V. Abdulrizak Isaac Yusuf
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2022-05-09

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Pirtle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 563×
• State v. Petrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 556×
• State v. Kitchen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-06· cited 499×
• City of Spokane v. Douglass
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-08-23· cited 388×
• Pirtle v. Morgan
  Ninth Circuit· 2002-12-19· cited 323×
• State v. Elliott
  Washington Supreme Court· 1990-01-25· cited 175×
• State v. Riley
  Washington Supreme Court· 1999-05-13· cited 162×
• State v. Williams
  Washington Supreme Court· 2001-06-28· cited 160×
• George Basiardanes v. City of Galveston
  Fifth Circuit· 1982-08-19· cited 143×
• State v. Stevenson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-21· cited 95×
• State v. Gerdts
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-17· cited 76×
• People v. Mota
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-01-26· cited 60×
• State v. Glas
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 50×
• State v. Eckblad
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-10-14· cited 46×
• State v. Goble
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-28· cited 28×