State v. Boyd

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 984

Syllabus

Appellant's convictions for having weapons while under disability and a firearm specification were supported by sufficient evidence. The court had jurisdiction to try appellant on the firearm specification, collateral estoppel did not bar the prosecution for having weapons while under disability, and defense counsel was not ineffective for failing to move for dismissal. The trial court did not violate Evid.R. 404(B); the court was free to consider evidence from the jury trial at the bench trial. Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law and was supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.