Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/8/2024

State v. Boyce

Citations

2024 Ohio 464

Syllabus

Confrontation clause ongoing emergency past event. Trial court's admission of caller's statements in 911 call did not violate the Confrontation Clause because the statements related to an ongoing emergency.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Scott
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-13· cited 10×
State v. Lucas
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-07· cited 9×
State v. Barnes
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-06-04

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Crawford v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
Davis v. Washington
Supreme Court· 2006-06-19· cited 4,179×
Whorton v. Bockting
Supreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
State v. Morris (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-11-20· cited 212×
State v. Harris (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 151×
State v. Siler
Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-10-25· cited 77×
State v. Boaston (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-26· cited 72×
State v. Kilbane
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-27· cited 33×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.