State v. Boyce
Citations
- 25 Wash. 422
- 65 P. 763
- 1901 Wash. LEXIS 409
Syllabus
<p>APPEALABLE ORDER — REFUSAL TO VACATE JUDGMENT AFTER AFFIRMANCE.</p> <p>Tbe action of the lower court in overruling a motion to vacate a final judgment, after its affirmance on appeal to the supreme 'court, is not an appealable order, under Bal. Code, § 6500, subd. 7, which provides that any party aggrieved may appeal from any final order made after judgment which affects a substantial right, since such second appeal would not raise any questions not passed upon, or which might have been passed upon, in the original appeal.</p> <p>SAME-JURISDICTION OF LOWER COURT TO MODIFY JUDGMENT AFTER AFFIRMANCE.</p> <p>Where a judgment of conviction has been affirmed on appeal and the lower court directed to carry out the judgment inflicting the death penalty, an order of the lower court overruling exceptions taken to its order for the issuance of the death warrant is not appealable.</p>
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rochester v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-10-02· cited 34×
- Jones v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court· 1921-07-28· cited 31×
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court· 1989-03-23· cited 22×
- Perrault v. Emporium Department Store Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1915-01-16· cited 21×
- Sound Investment Co. v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1907-01-05· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1911-03-14· cited 9×
- Olsen v. HaganWashington Supreme Court· 1919-10-28
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.