Jones v. Babcock
Citations
- 116 Wash. 424
- 199 P. 734
- 1921 Wash. LEXIS 848
Syllabus
<p>Judgment (106)—Vacation—Ebeor op Law. Error oí the court in applying the law to the facts, in making a decree of final distribution of an estate under the provisions of Rem. Code, § 1341, would constitute an “error of law”; and no distinction can be drawn between judgments in probate and other civil actions, nor from the fact that an administratrix procured the decree exactly in the form she asked it.</p> <p>Same (106). Under the settled practice of this state not to vacate judgments for error of law that could be corrected on appeal, a petition for the vacation of a judgment for error of law, discovered too late to be used on appeal, will not be entertained by the courts, though apparently sanctioned by Rem. Code, §§ 303, 464, 465.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The personal presence of the accused in open court when sentence was passed upon him is also shown.\
- “The personal presence of the accused in open court when sentence was passed upon him is also shown.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: MacKintosh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.