State v. Bowman
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2078
Syllabus
Appellant's petition for postconviction relief did not provide an affidavit or any other competent, relevant, and material evidence in support of his claim. It also did not establish that he relied on evidence that did not exist or was not available to him for use at trial or on appeal. Appellant's broad, self-serving statements in his petition were insufficient, and his claims were barred by res judicata. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Huffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. KapperOhio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 335×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-09· cited 92×
- State v. BlantonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 86×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-17· cited 17×
- State v. PerryOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-24· cited 7×
- State v. GriecoOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-12· cited 3×
- State v. BowmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.