Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/4/2025
State v. Bowman
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2729
Syllabus
Admission and Exclusion of Evidence at Trial; Witness Vouching; Evid.R. 701; Harmless Error. Even if the case worker's testimony constituted improper witness vouching, any such error was harmless because the victim testified at trial and was available for cross-examination.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court· 1989-10-25· cited 497×
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court· 1992-08-19· cited 262×
- State v. McKeeOhio Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 205×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-22· cited 92×
- State v. WendelOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-28· cited 26×
- State v. BumpOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-18· cited 20×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-31· cited 12×
- State v. BruceOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-18· cited 12×
- State v. DaleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-19· cited 10×
- Hetzer-Young v. Elano Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-10· cited 9×
- State v. NdaoOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 8×
- State v. SalyersOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-21· cited 7×
- State v. CarsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-10-26· cited 3×
- State v. LeighOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-04· cited 2×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-21· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.