Skip to main content
· 11/3/2017

State v. Ndao

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 8422
  • 99 N.E.3d 1127

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's conviction for tampering with records in violation of R.C. 2913.42(A)(2) is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and, as such, the conviction is based upon sufficient evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing opinion testimony under Evid.R. 701. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.