State v. Bowie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant's admission to four convictions when he had only one was harmless error
• concluding that the defendant's admission to four convictions when he had only one was harmless error
• defendant's admission to four convictions when he only had one, held to be harmless error
• where counsel does not dwell on point and where judge immediately gives cautionary instruction, improper comment on defendant’s silence and rendered harmless
• questions posed by the trial court designed to clarify testimony and expedite the trial did not disclose any partiality on the part of the trial court and were not prejudicial to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pitsch
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 288×
• State v. Gary M.B.
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2004-03-26· cited 62×
• State v. Boshcka
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1992-12-17· cited 17×
• State v. Gary M. B.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2003-03-06· cited 11×
• State v. Yang
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2004-04-13· cited 1×
• Toliver v. McCaughtry
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1995-12-18

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Asfoor
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 110×
• Thomas v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1941-06-02· cited 80×
• People v. Bowie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-22· cited 46×
• Lemerond v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1969-09-30· cited 23×
• Kwosek v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-06-29· cited 20×
• Schultz v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-04-05· cited 18×