State v. Boswell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the significance of territorial jurisdiction and concluding that a “more stringent approach needs to be followed in order to confer this type of authority”
• declining to address other issues when decision on prior issue was dispositive of appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McKERLEY
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-03-28· cited 36×
• State v. Burgess
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-07-02· cited 4×
• State v. Burgess
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-04-20· cited 2×
• State v. Alexander
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-08-22· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-07-26· cited 1,327×
• State v. Copeland
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-03-25· cited 68×
• State v. Dudley
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-05-31· cited 23×
• Smith v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2010-06-15· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Novick
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-07· cited 9×
• State v. McAteer
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-30· cited 7×
• Commonwealth v. Novick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-04-26· cited 4×