Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/2/1999
State v. Bostwick
Citations
- 251 Conn. 117
- 740 A.2d 381
- 1999 Conn. LEXIS 375
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘there is [generally] no constitutional requirement . . . that the trial court must first find that the violation was willful, before probation may be revoked’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McElveenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-08-06· cited 84×
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-06-12· cited 33×
- In re Jeffrey C.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-26· cited 20×
- Polizos v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-04-03· cited 18×
- State v. SHAKIRConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-08-02· cited 15×
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-19· cited 14×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 13×
- State v. FowlerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 12×
- State v. CyrConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-05-23· cited 12×
- Tracy v. Allstate InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-04-22· cited 8×
- State v. FisherConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-05-25· cited 6×
- State v. ShannonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-01-30· cited 5×
- State v. PressleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-25· cited 2×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-02-04· cited 1×
- State v. PenderConnecticut Superior Court· 2008-07-23
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-09-03· cited 228×
- In re Romance M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-04-19· cited 113×
- State v. GartlandSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-06-19· cited 86×
- Delevieleuse v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-06-16· cited 64×
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-03-21· cited 64×
- State v. BurnisonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 27×
- Conetta v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-11· cited 27×
- State v. TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-11-15· cited 17×
- State v. BostwickConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-06· cited 13×
- State v. BostwickSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-16· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.