State v. Bostick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding challenge to dog handler’s testimony on bloodhounds’ conduct on the ground it “violated appellant’s right to be confronted by the witnesses against him” was without merit; the handler was the witness, not the dog.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Dingle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-07-28· cited 23×
• State v. White
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Jenkins v. Delaware
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 222×
• State v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-07-14· cited 24×
• State v. Bostick
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-07-10· cited 10×
• Bostick v. South Carolina
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 8×
• Bostick v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-11-30· cited 4×