State v. Borchardt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in excluding expert testimony of \male sexual victimization\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Grecinger
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-09-18· cited 74×
• Doe v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul & Minneapolis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2012-07-25· cited 65×
• State v. MacLennan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-08-18· cited 53×
• Nabozny v. Burkhardt
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2000-03-07· cited 22×
• People v. Yates
  New York Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 4×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Myers
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-12-21· cited 253×
• State v. Saldana
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-31· cited 204×
• State v. Helterbridle
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-10-31· cited 88×
• State v. Hennum
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-06-16· cited 83×
• State v. Anderson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-12-13· cited 82×
• State v. Buchanan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1988-11-23· cited 79×