State v. Bond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an officer’s knocking on a defendant’s window for a period of time in order to rouse him did not constitute an exercise of authority sufficient to cause a reasonable person to believe that he or she had been restrained
• so stating in context of reasonable suspicion analysis
• “[C]ertainty is not required * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Kappel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-13· cited 15×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 10×
• State v. Aronson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-12-29· cited 5×
• State v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-04-13· cited 3×
• State v. Dendy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-24
• State v. Gattenby
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-12-11

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• State v. Holmes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 257×
• State v. Rhodes
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-12-31· cited 46×
• State v. Gerrish
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-07-25· cited 43×
• State v. Esplin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-09-24· cited 24×
• State v. Blair/Vanis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-11-22· cited 18×
• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-11-14· cited 13×
• State v. Crites
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-11-19· cited 10×
• State v. Ziebart
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-01-31· cited 4×
• State v. Guerricagoitia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-12-30· cited 3×