· 1/13/2020

State v. Bollheimer

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 60

Syllabus

Appellant's conviction for aggravated drug possession was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where significant amounts of methamphetamine were discovered in appellant's motel room in close proximity to appellant. The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress evidence where the search of appellant's motel room was lawful and the evidence was discovered in plain view. The trial court properly advised the jury that the testimony of an accomplice should be viewed with suspicion and weighed with caution, and therefore, substantially complied with R.C. 2923.03(D).

Judges: Ringland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.