State v. York

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 2457

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by admitting into evidence an audio recording of two jail-house phone calls initiated by appellant while appellant was in jail awaiting trial where a person with knowledge of how the audio recording was made testified to the audio recordings authenticity in accordance with Evid.R. 901(A). Additionally, appellant's conviction for three felony drug offenses was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence where appellant was found in possession of a bookbag containing three controlled substances, methamphetamine, fentanyl, and psilocin, during a traffic stop of a vehicle in which appellant was a passenger.