State v. Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to compel the prosecutor to reinstate pretrial diversion would be a violation of prosecutorial discretion
• finding “the statute creating the PTI program places no limitations on the state’s discretion to reinstate prosecution after PTI has been approved”
• finding \the statute creating the PTI program places no limitations on the state's discretion to reinstate prosecution after PTI has been approved\
• order requiring reinstatement of defendant's pretrial intervention pending review of decision to revoke it reversed; present issue of defendant's entitlement to dismissal reserved
• “A court can no more compel the state to reinstate a defendant’s pretrial intervention status than it can compel the state to place the defendant on pretrial intervention in the first place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reynaldo Castillo v. United States
  Eleventh Circuit· 2016-03-15· cited 59×
• State v. Simons
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-13· cited 8×
• Batista v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-21· cited 6×
• State v. Turner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-03· cited 6×
• Colby Taylor Lee v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 11th Dist. (Eastland)· 2018-10-11· cited 5×
• State v. Leukel
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-02-29· cited 3×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cleveland v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-15· cited 54×
• State v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-01· cited 9×