Skip to main content

Cleveland v. State

Citations

  • 417 So. 2d 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that \state attorney has complete discretion in making the decision to charge and prosecute\
  • “The pretrial intervention program is merely an alternative to prosecution and should remain in the prosecutor’s discretion.”
  • pretrial diversion decision of state attorney is prosecutorial in nature and thus not subject to judicial review
  • court may not override prosecutor's refusal to consent to pretrial diversion of defendant, essentially a conditional decision not to prosecute
  • “ ‘[T]he discretion of a prosecutor in deciding whether and how to prosecute is absolute in our system of criminal justice.’ ”
  • with regard to the general pretrial intervention program of section 948.08(2), the decision of the state attorney is prosecutorial in nature and not subject to judicial review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.