Skip to main content

State v. Blankenship

Citations

  • 69 S.E.2d 398
  • 137 W. Va. 1
  • 1952 W. Va. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Omission of material portions of a witness’ prior written statement constitutes “surprise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haymond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.