City of Spokane v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a Spokane domestic assault ordinance, even though the ordinance prohibited a greater range of conduct than the State statute, because the statute did not expressly permit the behavior that Spokane banned and so the laws did not conflict
• upholding a Spokane domestic assault ordinance, even though the ordinance prohibited a greater range of conduct than the State statute, because the statute did not expressly permit the behavior that Spokane banned and so the laws did not conflict
• “A reply brief is generally not the proper forum to address new issues because the respondent does not get an opportunity to address the newly raised issues.”
• “A reply brief is generally not the proper forum to address new issues because the respondent does not get an opportunity to address the newly raised issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).