Skip to main content

State v. Blakley

Citations

  • 568 P.2d 270
  • 90 N.M. 744
  • 1977 NMCA 088

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of photograph of the victim’s body was proper because it “illustrated, clarified, and corroborated the testimony of various witnesses”
  • holding that admission of photograph of the victim’s body was proper because it “illustrated, clarified, and corroborated the testimony of various witnesses”
  • determining that there had been no abuse of discretion where 10 photographs of the victim’s body and the defendant’s vehicle were admitted into 11 evidence in vehicular homicide prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Hendley, Hernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.