Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1/29/1982
State v. Blair
Citations
- 634 S.W.2d 627
- 1982 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the negative evidence rule promotes more confusion than clarity, we think the better practice would be to omit the instruction altogether.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Byers, Cornelius, Daughtrey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. HatchettTennessee Supreme Court· 1978-01-16· cited 354×
- State v. MorganTennessee Supreme Court· 1976-08-09· cited 159×
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1906-11-23· cited 72×
- Bethany v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1978-02-02· cited 54×
- Davis v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1974-10-25· cited 33×
- Dalton v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court· 1957-12-24· cited 25×
- Whitfield v. LovelessCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1925-08-29· cited 14×
- Ted Wallin, Administrator of the Estate of Rosie Kazarian v. The Greyhound CorporationSixth Circuit· 1965-02-26· cited 11×
- Fults v. PearsallE.D. Tennessee· 1975-03-03· cited 6×
- Atkins v. Smith Ex Rel. SmithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1928-01-07· cited 3×
- William v. KirkmanTennessee Supreme Court· 1879-12-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.