Skip to main content

State v. Blair

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 266

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's guilty and no contest pleas were knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. Because defendant-appellant entered a no contest plea to the charge of reckless homicide, any error relating to his objections to the State's evidence during his trial for murder did not materially affect his conviction for reckless homicide. Because the bill of information was sufficient to charge the offense of reckless homicide, by pleading no contest to the bill of information, defendant-appellant is foreclosed from challenging the factual merits of the reckless homicide charge. Defendant-appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.