Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2/24/1988
State v. Black
Citations
- 537 A.2d 1154
- 1988 Me. LEXIS 44
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- permitting expert testimony in part to explain timing and sequencing inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony
- permitting expert testimony in part to explain timing and sequencing inconsistencies in the victim’s testimony
- finding expert’s testimony to be admissible in part and inadmissible in part
- improper bolstering of a witness’s credibility “can have a profound impact on the outcome of the trial, particularly, as in the present case, when the prosecution offers the evidence to establish its case in chief.”
- “Under the Maine Rules of Evidence [702], a qualified expert possessing specialized knowledge may testify in order to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.”
- “Under the Maine Rules of Evidence [702], a qualified expert possessing specialized knowledge may testify in order to assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Nichols, Roberts, Wathen, Glassman, Scolnik, Clifford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. Edward Charles L.West Virginia Supreme Court· 1990-09-21· cited 2,400×
- Duckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-10-10· cited 294×
- United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyTenth Circuit· 1999-08-27· cited 221×
- State v. RimmaschUtah Supreme Court· 1989-05-17· cited 202×
- Steward v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1995-06-23· cited 116×
- State v. J.Q.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-01-06· cited 98×
- Goodson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1990-07-11· cited 74×
- State v. J.Q.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 52×
- State v. ReserSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-01-20· cited 51×
- Searles v. Fleetwood Homes of Pennsylvania, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-08-05· cited 45×
- State v. ShortsleevesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-08-30· cited 44×
- State v. GokeySupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-03-16· cited 39×
- State v. ScheffelmanMontana Supreme Court· 1991-11-18· cited 34×
- Handrahan v. MalenkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2011-01-25· cited 34×
- Hutton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-28· cited 30×
- State v. MacRaeSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-06· cited 26×
- State v. WoodburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1989-05-30· cited 22×
- Oliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-05-07· cited 18×
- Cooke v. NaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-04-13· cited 16×
- State v. GordiusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1988-07-14· cited 16×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court· 1983-01-18· cited 320×
- People v. BledsoeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-06-14· cited 291×
- State v. BarrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-07-15· cited 259×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-01-17· cited 170×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-07-10· cited 103×
- People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1987-11-30· cited 97×
- State v. AnayaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-12-29· cited 60×
- State v. PhilbrickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-10-27· cited 58×
- State v. ConlogueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-04-03· cited 36×
- State v. TwistSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-07-21· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.