Supreme Court of Missouri· 5/11/1982
State v. Bishop
Citations
- 632 S.W.2d 255
- 1982 Mo. LEXIS 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that drugged condition of defendant was involuntarily produced where it was caused by defendant’s addiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finch, Bardgett, Rendlen, Baldwin, Morgan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-03-23· cited 37×
- State v. SextonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-06-09· cited 27×
- State v. ShieldsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1993-10-05· cited 13×
- State v. ElamMissouri Court of Appeals· 1989-10-10· cited 12×
- State v. BurroughsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1987-03-31· cited 6×
- State v. SamuelsMissouri Court of Appeals· 1995-09-01· cited 2×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court· 1968-10-14· cited 697×
- United States v. Charles FreemanSecond Circuit· 1966-02-28· cited 220×
- State v. SeelySupreme Court of Kansas· 1973-05-12· cited 47×
- People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-26· cited 24×
- People v. QuinnAppellate Court of Illinois· 1977-03-17· cited 24×
- State v. PalacioSupreme Court of Kansas· 1977-01-22· cited 14×
- People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals· 1967-04-11· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.