State v. Birmingham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that procedural rules may not diminish or augment substantive rights
• the manner in which appeal is exercised is procedural
• the manner in which appeal is exercised is procedural
• characterizing appeal as special proceeding commenced in superior court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Campbell v. Superior Court
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1971-01-15· cited 184×
• Daou v. Harris
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-02-14· cited 172×
• State v. Birmingham
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-06-04· cited 120×
• Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of Insurance
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-12-22· cited 59×
• Montgomery v. Sheldon
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-04-04· cited 54×
• Campbell v. Chatwin
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1967-05-25· cited 46×
• State v. Stevens
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-12-24· cited 40×
• State v. Baca
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-10-29· cited 37×
• In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-933
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-10-13· cited 35×
• SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-04-30· cited 34×
• State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-01-15· cited 30×
• Roddy v. County of Maricopa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1996-01-23· cited 24×
• State Ex Rel. Department of Economic Security v. Waldren
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2007-12-03· cited 24×
• Ethridge v. Arizona State Board of Nursing
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-21· cited 20×
• State Compensation Fund v. De La Fuente
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-05· cited 19×
• State v. Fowler
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-10-29· cited 18×
• State v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA C.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1987-10-01· cited 18×
• Bick v. State, Department of Justice, Division of Motor Vihicles
  Montana Supreme Court· 1986-12-30· cited 17×
• Martin v. Super. Ct. in & for Cty. of Maricopa
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-03· cited 16×
• Matter of App. in Maricopa Cty., Juv. Act.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-05-13· cited 14×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States Ex Rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy
  Supreme Court· 1950-02-06· cited 577×
• Lichter v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 478×
• Schecter v. Killingsworth
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1963-03-27· cited 123×
• Hernandez v. Frohmiller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1949-04-04· cited 84×
• Southwest Engineering Co. v. Ernst
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1955-12-20· cited 62×
• South Carolina State Highway Department v. Harbin
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1955-03-15· cited 43×
• Vallat v. Radium Dial Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1935-04-17· cited 40×
• Haggard v. Industrial Commission
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1950-11-03· cited 38×
• State v. Marana Plantations, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1953-01-15· cited 33×
• Tillotson v. Frohmiller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1928-11-21· cited 29×
• Sturgill v. Beard
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1957-07-08· cited 17×
• Loftus v. Russell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1949-12-05· cited 15×
• Ross v. Macduff
  New York Court of Appeals· 1955-07-08· cited 15×
• Duncan v. A. R. Krull Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1941-06-30· cited 9×
• State v. Wacker
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1959-10-07· cited 8×